Canon 16 35mm f2.8 › Optical Performance
35 positive · 14 mixed · 12 critical mentions across 61 sources.
Sharpness, autofocus, stabilization, color, build quality, everything.
which is only an average maximum aperture now Canon don't exactly have a shining reputation for making full-frame Ultra wideangle lenses their aging 17 to 40 mm L lens has soft corners and their 14 mm f2.8 lens is ridiculously overpriced while being no sharper than samyang's offering a quarter of…
like shallow depth of field although it doesn't make that much of a difference in full frame especially with wide angle lenses like this I feel like the community has really enforced that 2.8 aperture is ideal so if you're in the market I do recommend 2.8 because you might find yourself in…
Read the full sourced terrain: Canon 16 35mm f2.8 review.
Counts are drawn from the sources we track and reflect what reviewers said, not a score — AskMaddi charts the terrain, it does not rate.