Canon 16 35mm f2.8 › Weight & Portability
6 positive · 2 mixed · 2 critical mentions across 10 sources.
The bottom line is that while those the weight certainly adds up and so if you're counting ounces and you want as little weight as possible, the new 16 to35 L mark III is the lighter of the two lenses.
15 to 30 mm f2.8 VC USD which is also image stabilized let's do a quick comparison I can imagine some people will be weighing those two up you've just heard me talking trash about the Canon lens's size well the Behemoth Tamron lens's mass is even more unwieldy it weighs well over a kilogram and…
has a little bit of character to it the next thing I found to be nice about this lens is because I use it for vlogging and filming myself and traveling and all that stuff I like the fact that it's kind of small and lightweight it is the lightest out of any Canon 16 to 35 lens that's ever
Read the full sourced terrain: Canon 16 35mm f2.8 review.
Counts are drawn from the sources we track and reflect what reviewers said, not a score — AskMaddi charts the terrain, it does not rate.