Canon 200 400mm f4: Bokeh

5 positive · 2 mixed · 1 critical mentions across 8 sources.

look pretty nice and smooth to me even quite complex and difficult backgrounds no obvious problems here well I don't often test super telephoto lenses like these because I'm not an experienced Sports photographer but it was enjoyable to use this lens for a bit of wildlife photography It's…

— Christopher Frost (source)

I think having a 400 at f/2.8 would be even better having that shallow depth of field and that really good separation from the background.

— Derek Livingston (source)

The U, which is the female sheep, is very nicely separated from the background, which is one thing that I was really worried about switching from a 2.8 lens to something with a little bit higher aperture.

— Fox + Fir (source)

Read the full sourced terrain: Canon 200 400mm f4 review.

Counts are drawn from the sources we track and reflect what reviewers said, not a score — AskMaddi charts the terrain, it does not rate.