Sigma 16 300mm f3.5 › Weight & Portability
7 positive · 10 mixed · 1 critical mentions across 18 sources.
It's not too light, not too heavy.
and the weight the closest Lens that I own that is comparable to this is the Tamron 28 to 75 G2 the sigma is just a few millimeters longer overall length is 123 mm which is just under 5 in weight is a very modest 615 G just a little bit heavier than that Tamron but I have to say
usual it's a totally independent review the lens is long and thin made of plastic but it feels solid enough and at 615 G or just under 1 and 1/2 lb it does have a little weight to it has some weather seiling to it too including a gasket around the rear mount it doesn't have many controls on its
Read the full sourced terrain: Sigma 16 300mm f3.5 review.
Counts are drawn from the sources we track and reflect what reviewers said, not a score — AskMaddi charts the terrain, it does not rate.